Estado actual de la actividad y formación académica de residentes y urólogos jóvenes en España. Resultados de una encuesta nacional / Current status of young urologists and residents' activity and academic training in Spain. National survey results

Objetivo: Conocer el estado actual de la actividad y formación académica de los residentes y urólogos jóvenes en España. Material y métodos: Se diseñó una encuesta anónima de 32 preguntas, desde el Grupo de Trabajo de Residentes y Jóvenes Urólogos de la Asociación Española de Urología (RAEU), dirigida a evaluar la actividad académica de los residentes, definida por: número de comunicaciones a congresos, publicaciones en revistas nacionales e internacionales, rotaciones clínicas dentro de España y en el extranjero, realización de máster, doctorado (PhD), aplicaciones para presentar el examen de la European Board of Urology y competencias en idiomas de residentes. La encuesta fue enviada vía email y difundida vía redes sociales. Resultados: Se obtuvieron 91 respondedores; el 66% afirmaron no tener publicaciones en revistas científicas, el 67% no han realizado rotaciones en el extranjero. Solo el 21% afirmaron presentarse al examen EBU. Solo el 2% de los respondedores han realizado un fellowship, aunque la mayoría (82%) no lo han realizado, pero sí estarían interesados. Sin embargo, el 67% de los respondedores opinan que la relevancia de la actividad académica/investigadora es alta a muy elevada. Conclusiones: Los resultados indican que la actividad académica, la producción científica y la publicación de artículos de los residentes y urólogos jóvenes en España es baja. Así también, la participación en el examen EBU, así como la realización de máster, PhD, rotaciones y fellowship, son bajas. Sin embargo, la valoración de la actividad científica es considerada como muy relevante

Objective: To study the current status of the activity and academic training of residents and young urologists in Spain. Material and methods: From the working group of residents and young urologists of the Spanish Association of Urology (AEU), an anonymous survey of 32 questions was designed. Its aim was to evaluate the academic activity of residents, defined by: number of communications to congresses, publications in national and international journals, clinical rotations within Spain and abroad, master's degree, Doctorate (PhD), applications to the European Board of Urology exam and language competences. The survey was sent via email and disseminated through social networks. Results: Ninety-one respondents were obtained; 66% affirmed not having publications in scientific journals, 67% did not perform rotations abroad. Only 21% claimed to have taken the EBU exam. Only 2% of the respondents had completed a Fellowship. Although most of them (82%) had not done so, they would be interested. However, 67% of respondents believed that the relevance of academic/research activity is from high to very high. Conclusions: Our results indicate that academic activity, scientific production and publication of articles of the residents and young urologists in Spain is low. Moreover, participation in the EBU exam, the completion of a master's degree, PhD, rotations and fellowship is low. In contrast, the assessment of scientific activity is considered to be very relevant

Current status of young urologists and residents' activity and academic training in Spain. National survey results. / Estado actual de la actividad y formación académica de residentes y urólogos jóvenes en España. Resultados de una encuesta nacional.

OBJECTIVE: To study the current status of the activity and academic training of residents and young urologists in Spain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From the working group of residents and young urologists of the Spanish Association of Urology (AEU), an anonymous survey of 32 questions was designed. Its aim was to evaluate the academic activity of residents, defined by: number of communications to congresses, publications in national and international journals, clinical rotations within Spain and abroad, master's degree, Doctorate (PhD), applications to the European Board of Urology exam and language competences. The survey was sent via email and disseminated through social networks. RESULTS: Ninety-one respondents were obtained; 66% affirmed not having publications in scientific journals, 67% did not perform rotations abroad. Only 21% claimed to have taken the EBU exam. Only 2% of the respondents had completed a Fellowship. Although most of them (82%) had not done so, they would be interested. However, 67% of respondents believed that the relevance of academic/research activity is from high to very high. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that academic activity, scientific production and publication of articles of the residents and young urologists in Spain is low. Moreover, participation in the EBU exam, the completion of a master's degree, PhD, rotations and fellowship is low. In contrast, the assessment of scientific activity is considered to be very relevant.

Actividad médico-quirúrgica y estado actual de la formación de los residentes de urología en España: Resultados de una encuesta nacional / Medical-surgical activity and the current state of training of urology residents in Spain: Results of a national survey

Objetivos: Conocer el estado actual de la actividad médico-quirúrgica y de la formación de los residentes de urología en España. Material y método: Se diseñaron 2 encuestas anónimas y fueron cargadas en la herramienta Google Docs© para ser contestadas vía online. El periodo de recolección online fue de septiembre de 2015-enero de 2016. Los datos recolectados fueron procesados utilizando el programa estadístico IBM SPSS para Windows, Versión 21.0 y el programa R versión 3.2.3. Resultados: El número de total de respondedores fue de 163. En referencia al número de guardias de presencia física la mayoría de los residentes realizan entre 4 y 6 guardias al mes. Ochenta y cuatro de los encuestados refieren estar menos de 20 horas semanales en quirófano y 43 de estos incluso menos de 10 horas. El 30% de los encuestados no ha realizado ninguna resección transuretral, la mayoría ha realizado al menos una adenomectomía prostática, pero a su vez no ha realizado ningún procedimiento oncológico mayor, ya sea por vía laparoscópica o abierta. En las preguntas destinadas a entrenamiento y cursos de formación encontramos que la mayoría de los residentes entrena laparoscopia en el hospital o en casa. La satisfacción global de la residencia fue valorada en 2,6. En este sentido podría considerarse la satisfacción global como moderada. Conclusiones: Se deberían orientar esfuerzos para estandarizar la adquisición de habilidades quirúrgicas y no quirúrgicas, garantizar el acceso a cursos de formación, establecer un mínimo de intervenciones requeridas por año y lograr una evaluación objetiva de la especialidad

Objectives: To determine the actual state of medical-surgical activity and training for urology residents in Spain. Material and method: We designed 2 anonymous surveys, which were uploaded with the Google Docs© tool so that the respondents could answer the surveys online. The online collection period was September 2015 to January 2016. The collected data were processing using the statistical programme IBM SPSS for Windows, Version 21.0 and the programme R version 3.2.3. Results: The total number of responders was 163. In reference to the number of physically present on-call residents, the majority conducted between 4 and 6 shifts a month. Eighty-four of those surveyed indicated that they were in the operating room less than 20hours a week, and 43 of these even less than 10hours. Thirty percent of those surveyed had not performed any transurethral resection. The majority had performed at least one prostatic adenomectomy, but had not performed any major oncologic procedure, either laparoscopically or openly. In the questions concerning training and training courses, we found that most of the residents trained in laparoscopy at the hospital or at home. The overall satisfaction for the residence was assessed at 2.6. Based on this score, the overall satisfaction could be considered moderate. Conclusions: Efforts should be directed towards standardising the acquisition of surgical and nonsurgical skills, ensuring access to training courses, establishing a minimum of required operations per year and achieving an objective assessment of the specialty

Medical-surgical activity and the current state of training of urology residents in Spain: Results of a national survey. / Actividad médico-quirúrgica y estado actual de la formación de los residentes de urología en España: Resultados de una encuesta nacional.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the actual state of medical-surgical activity and training for urology residents in Spain. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We designed 2 anonymous surveys, which were uploaded with the Google Docs© tool so that the respondents could answer the surveys online. The online collection period was September 2015 to January 2016. The collected data were processing using the statistical programme IBM SPSS for Windows, Version 21.0 and the programme R version 3.2.3. RESULTS: The total number of responders was 163. In reference to the number of physically present on-call residents, the majority conducted between 4 and 6 shifts a month. Eighty-four of those surveyed indicated that they were in the operating room less than 20hours a week, and 43 of these even less than 10hours. Thirty percent of those surveyed had not performed any transurethral resection. The majority had performed at least one prostatic adenomectomy, but had not performed any major oncologic procedure, either laparoscopically or openly. In the questions concerning training and training courses, we found that most of the residents trained in laparoscopy at the hospital or at home. The overall satisfaction for the residence was assessed at 2.6. Based on this score, the overall satisfaction could be considered moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts should be directed towards standardising the acquisition of surgical and nonsurgical skills, ensuring access to training courses, establishing a minimum of required operations per year and achieving an objective assessment of the specialty.